Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 13 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2024-01-15 |
| -- | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| -- | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, getting a global score of 79.2 against 77.1. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the newer 15 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version, offering some nice extra features and better performance.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a way better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much less brightness and a bit smaller screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher 200 MP resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 6 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.