Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-05 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with an 81.1 score against 79.2. These phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a little better battery duration than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.