Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-04-07 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having a 79.2 score against 79. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the newer 15 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11, so it counts with lots of additional features and better performance. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) construction is extremely newer, a bit lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a back facing camera with more MP and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.