Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.132.4
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--2015-01-05
3.85 x 2.08 x 0.54 inches4.57 x 1.97 x 0.51 inches
3.35 ounces2.77 ounces
--Black, Green and White
$ 629.00$ 249.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.16
processor processor
--8 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.67
Storage
5,63 MB internal memory--
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.21.32
Camera
0.30 MP0.30 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
3.633.85
GPRS and GSMEDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM, Dual SIM
0.20.4
Battery Life
680mAh Li-Ion Battery1100mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
6.5 hours talk time
696 hours standby time
20 hours talk time
2.082.72
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 3.0

Comparison review

Nokia 215 is slightly better than Motorola RAZR V3, getting a 32.4 score against 30.1. The Nokia 215 body is lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola RAZR V3. The Motorola RAZR V3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia 215. They have 0 cpu cores. Nokia 215 has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola RAZR V3, because it has a higher resolution of 320 x 240px.

The Nokia 215 has just a bit better camera than Motorola RAZR V3. Both of them have a same resolution back camera. Nokia 215 features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola RAZR V3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 32 GB. The Nokia 215 features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola RAZR V3, because it has 1100mAh of battery capacity.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Nokia 215 is also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.