Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.133
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--2005-06-13
3.85 x 2.08 x 0.54 inches3.94 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches
3.35 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 629.00$ 220.00
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--222 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.16.5
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
5,63 MB internal memory6,14 MB internal memory
No SD card slotminiSD external memory slot
0.20.2
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
3.634.73
GPRS and GSMUMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.4
Battery Life
680mAh Li-Ion Battery970mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
6.5 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.082.56
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.0
--Infra-red port

Comparison review

Nokia 6280 is just a bit better than Motorola RAZR V3, with a 33 score against 30.1. Although it's the best we are comparing, the Nokia 6280 is a a little bit heavier and extremely thicker phone than Motorola RAZR V3. Nokia 6280 and Motorola RAZR V3 feature very similar processors, they have a 0-Core processing unit.

Nokia 6280 features a way better looking display than Motorola RAZR V3, because it has a higher 320 x 240 resolution. The Nokia 6280 shoots greater videos and photos than Motorola RAZR V3, because it has a way better 2 megapixels resolution back camera. Nokia 6280 and Motorola RAZR V3 both have quite similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, although the Nokia 6280 also has 6,14 MB internal memory capacity.

The Nokia 6280 has a much better battery performance than Motorola RAZR V3, because it has 970mAh of battery capacity.

Nokia 6280 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.