Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 32.8 | 35.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | 2011-03-09 |
| 3.85 x 2.06 x 0.53 inches | 3.80 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches |
| 3.49 ounces | 3.20 ounces |
| -- | Gray |
| $ 99.00 | $ 79.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 307 hours standby time 3.6 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Factor has a score of 35.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola RAZR V3a's 32.8 score. Samsung Factor's body is just a little bit lighter but incredibly thicker than Motorola RAZR V3a. The Samsung Factor counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola RAZR V3a, because although it has a way lower 160 x 128px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel count per inch in the display.
The Samsung Factor's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as Motorola RAZR V3a's one. Samsung Factor's processor is just as good as the Motorola RAZR V3a one, they have 0 CPU cores. Motorola RAZR V3a has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Factor, because it has a 900mAh battery capacity against 800mAh.
Motorola RAZR V3a and Samsung Factor count with quite similar cameras, they have the same resolution camera in the back.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Factor is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.