Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 32.8 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 3.85 x 2.06 x 0.53 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 3.49 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 99.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 4.8 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 101 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3.63 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 0.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 307 hours standby time 3.6 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket is way better than Motorola RAZR V3a, having a 71.5 score against 32.8. The Galaxy S III Cricket design is incredibly thinner but much heavier than Motorola RAZR V3a. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola RAZR V3a, because it has a way higher amount of pixels per display inch and a lot higher 1280 x 720 resolution.
The Galaxy S III Cricket features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola RAZR V3a, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 64 GB. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola RAZR V3a, because it has an additional graphics co-processor and a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a way better battery performance than Motorola RAZR V3a, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a greater camera than Motorola RAZR V3a, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
The Galaxy S III Cricket costs a bit more money than Motorola RAZR V3a, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.