Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 62.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2005-11-08 | 2020-10-19 |
| 3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches | 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 3.49 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 90.00 | $ 89.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.5 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| -- | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 30,72 MB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 740mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 215 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 2 V Tella is a lot better than Motorola RAZR V3c, having a global score of 62.1 against 31.2. The Nokia 2 V Tella construction is noticeably newer and noticeably thinner, but also noticeably heavier than Motorola RAZR V3c. The Nokia 2 V Tella has an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a way higher 720 x 1440 resolution.
The Nokia 2 V Tella has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has 16 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB. Nokia 2 V Tella counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster).
Nokia 2 V Tella has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a 305 percent more battery capacity. The Nokia 2 V Tella features a greater camera than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a lot better resolution back camera.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Nokia 2 V Tella is also the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.