Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.231
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
2005-11-082007-05-03
3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches
3.49 ounces2.32 ounces
$ 90.00$ 85.00
176 x 220 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
--73 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
34.8
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
30,72 MB internal memory2,05 MB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
0.40.1
Camera
1.30 MP0.30 MP
4.513.63
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
740mAh Li-Ion Battery700mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
215 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
320 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.162.08
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth
GPS--
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Motorola RAZR V3c has a global score of 31.2, which is slightly better than the Nokia 2630's score of 31. Motorola RAZR V3c is an older, way heavier and a lot thicker cellphone than Nokia 2630. The Nokia 2630's processor is just as good as the processing unit in Motorola RAZR V3c, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit.

Nokia 2630 has a way better screen than Motorola RAZR V3c, although it has a way worse 160 x 128 resolution. The Motorola RAZR V3c counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 2630, because it has 30,72 MB internal storage. The Motorola RAZR V3c counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Nokia 2630, because it has 740mAh of battery capacity.

The Motorola RAZR V3c shoots a lot better videos and photos than Nokia 2630, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.

Although Motorola RAZR V3c is a better device, it costs a bit more than Nokia 2630, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Nokia 2630. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Nokia 2630, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.