Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.231.2
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
2005-11-082008-04-02
3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches3.89 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches
3.49 ounces3.33 ounces
$ 90.00$ 79.00
176 x 220 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
--102 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
35.2
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
30,72 MB internal memory32,77 MB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
0.40.4
Camera
1.30 MP0.30 MP
--128 x 96 video resolution
4.513.63
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
740mAh Li-Ion Battery860mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
215 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
419 hours standby time
3.4 hours talk time
2.162.32
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth 2.0
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia 2680 slide is a little bit better than Motorola RAZR V3c, getting a score of 31.2 against 31.2. The Nokia 2680 slide body is much newer and just a little lighter, but also just a bit thicker than the Motorola RAZR V3c. The Nokia 2680 slide's processor is just as good as Motorola RAZR V3c's processor, both of them have 0 processing cores.

The Nokia 2680 slide counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola RAZR V3c, although it has a lot worse 160 x 128 pixels resolution. The Nokia 2680 slide features as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Motorola RAZR V3c one, although the Nokia 2680 slide also has 2,05 MB more internal memory capacity.

The Nokia 2680 slide features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has 860mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola RAZR V3c counts with a much better camera than Nokia 2680 slide, because it has a much better resolution back facing camera.

Nokia 2680 slide is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.