Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2005-11-08 | 2019-06-10 |
| 3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 3.49 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 90.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.5 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| -- | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 30,72 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 740mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 215 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 3.1 A is way better than Motorola RAZR V3c, with a 64.8 score against 31.2. The Nokia 3.1 A design is a lot newer and notably thinner, but also heavier than Motorola RAZR V3c. The Nokia 3.1 A has a way better screen than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a way higher 720 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has more CPU cores. The Nokia 3.1 A captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a lot higher resolution camera. The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 128 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity.
Nokia 3.1 A counts with a much better battery life than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a 304% bigger battery size.
The Nokia 3.1 A and the Motorola RAZR V3c cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.