Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.234.2
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
2005-11-082008-04-22
3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches4.25 x 1.71 x 0.41 inches
3.49 ounces2.75 ounces
$ 90.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
36.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
30,72 MB internal memory30,72 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.40.4
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
--220 x 176 video resolution
4.514.73
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
740mAh Li-Ion Battery1020mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
215 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
406 hours standby time
5.3 hours talk time
2.162.64
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is a bit better than the Motorola RAZR V3c, getting a 34.2 score against 31.2. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic's body is incredibly newer, extremely thinner and noticeably lighter than the Motorola RAZR V3c. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic's processor is very similar to Motorola RAZR V3c's processing unit, they have the same number of cores.

The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic features an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240px. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as Motorola RAZR V3c's one, both have the same internal storage. The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera.

The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has 1020mAh of battery capacity against 740mAh.

Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is also cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.