Search


Compare phones

Samsung E2210
Global Score
31.234.1
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
2005-11-082009-02-16
3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches3.70 x 1.83 x 0.73 inches
3.49 ounces3.00 ounces
$ 90.00$ 75.00
Display / Screen
--1.8 inches
176 x 220 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
--114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
35.4
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
30,72 MB internal memory9,22 MB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
0.40.2
Camera
1.30 MP0.30 MP
4.513.63
CDMAGPRS and GSM
--SIM
0.10.2
Battery Life
740mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
215 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
192 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
2.162.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1--
GPS--

Comparison review

Samsung E2210 has a global score of 34.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola RAZR V3c's 31.2 global score. Samsung E2210 is a incredibly newer and somewhat lighter device than Motorola RAZR V3c, but it's somewhat thicker. The Samsung E2210's CPU is just as good as the Motorola RAZR V3c one, both of them have a 0-Core CPU.

The Samsung E2210 has a much sharper display than Motorola RAZR V3c, although it has a much lower resolution of 160 x 128 pixels. Motorola RAZR V3c captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung E2210, because it has a camera with a much higher resolution. The Motorola RAZR V3c features much more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung E2210, because it has 21,5 MB more internal storage.

Samsung E2210 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has an 800mAh battery capacity against 740mAh.

The Samsung E2210 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.