Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.134
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
2006-04-042009-05-18
3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches4.31 x 1.85 x 0.57 inches
3.49 ounces3.09 ounces
$ 270.00$ 199.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
36.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
23,55 MB internal memory30,72 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.30.4
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
CDMAUMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.4
Battery Life
740mAh Li-Ion Battery1020mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
215 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
396 hours standby time
7.4 hours talk time
2.162.64
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia 2730 classic is a little bit better than the Motorola RAZR V3m, with a 34 score against 31.1. The Nokia 2730 classic design is extremely newer, just a little bit thinner and lighter than Motorola RAZR V3m. Nokia 2730 classic counts with a way better screen than Motorola RAZR V3m, because it has a higher resolution of 320 x 240.

The Nokia 2730 classic features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola RAZR V3m, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola RAZR V3m and Nokia 2730 classic feature extremely similar processors, both have 0 cores.

The Nokia 2730 classic shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola RAZR V3m, because it has a much better resolution camera. Nokia 2730 classic counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola RAZR V3m, because it has 1020mAh of battery capacity.

Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Nokia 2730 classic is also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.