Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.134.1
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
2006-04-040000-00-00
3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches4.18 x 1.71 x 0.46 inches
3.49 ounces3.20 ounces
$ 270.00$ 201.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
36.6
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
23,55 MB internal memory9,22 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.30.2
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
740mAh Li-Ion Battery860mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
215 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
348 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
2.162.32
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth 2.0
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia 6300 has an overall score of 34.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola RAZR V3m's 31.1 overall score. Nokia 6300's design is incredibly thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola RAZR V3m. Nokia 6300 has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola RAZR V3m, because it has a higher resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.

The Nokia 6300 and Motorola RAZR V3m feature quite similar processors, both have a 0-Core processor. The Motorola RAZR V3m features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 6300, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 14,33 MB more internal memory capacity.

The Nokia 6300 takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola RAZR V3m, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Nokia 6300 features a bit superior battery duration than Motorola RAZR V3m, because it has a 16 percent greater battery capacity.

Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Nokia 6300 is also very cheap compared to the other devices.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.