Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.1 | 34 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| 2006-04-04 | 2006-09-26 |
| 3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches | 3.74 x 2.04 x 0.79 inches |
| 3.49 ounces | 4.35 ounces |
| $ 270.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.4 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 23,55 MB internal memory | 61,44 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.80 aperture |
| 4.51 | 5.5 |
| CDMA | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 740mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 215 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia N75 has an overall score of 34, which is just a bit better than Motorola RAZR V3m's overall score of 31.1. The Nokia N75 body is somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker than Motorola RAZR V3m. The Nokia N75 features a much better display than Motorola RAZR V3m, because it has a higher resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.
The Nokia N75's processing unit is just as good as the Motorola RAZR V3m one, both of them have 0 cpu cores. Nokia N75 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola RAZR V3m, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 61,44 MB internal memory.
Nokia N75 features a much better camera than Motorola RAZR V3m, because it has a way higher resolution back-facing camera. Nokia N75 has a bit better battery life than Motorola RAZR V3m, because it has 800mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Nokia N75 is also by far the cheapest, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.