Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.5 | 38.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.3 |
| 2006-07-25 | 2008-02-11 |
| 4.05 x 2.08 x 0.60 inches | 4.25 x 1.85 x 0.59 inches |
| 3.77 ounces | 3.17 ounces |
| $ 280.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 2.2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 182 pixels per inch | 182 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 6.5 |
| processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 51,2 MB internal memory | 122,88 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 6.05 |
| HSDPA, UMTS and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.7 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 940mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 400 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
Nokia 6220 classic has a general score of 38.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola RAZR V3xx's 35.5 general score. The Nokia 6220 classic construction is newer, a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola RAZR V3xx. The Nokia 6220 classic has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola RAZR V3xx. Both of them have the same exact 320 x 240 resolution, the same number of pixels per screen inch and a display with the same size.
The Nokia 6220 classic counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola RAZR V3xx, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 122,88 MB internal storage. Nokia 6220 classic has just a bit better processing power than Motorola RAZR V3xx, because it has a greater number of cores.
Nokia 6220 classic features a very superior camera than Motorola RAZR V3xx, because it has a way better 5 mega pixels resolution back facing camera. Motorola RAZR V3xx counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Nokia 6220 classic, because it has 940mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Nokia 6220 classic is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.