Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2008-08-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 3.86 x 1.97 x 0.64 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 3.50 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 910mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 234 hours standby time 4.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than the Motorola RAZR VE20's score of 35.3. The LG V35 ThinQ body is noticeably newer and much thinner than Motorola RAZR VE20's, although it is extremely heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot better performance than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better looking display than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has a lot greater screen density, a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a really larger display. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better camera than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has more internal memory. The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior battery performance than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 910mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than the Motorola RAZR VE20, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.