Compare phones
Motorola RAZR VE20
VE20Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 35.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2008-08-18 | 2013-09-04 |
| 3.86 x 1.97 x 0.64 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 0.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 910mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 234 hours standby time 4.4 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 80.7, which is way better than the Motorola RAZR VE20's global score of 35.3. Galaxy Note 3's design is way newer and incredibly thinner than Motorola RAZR VE20's, although it is also way heavier. The Galaxy Note 3 features a lot better screen than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has a way higher resolution of 1920 x 1080, a way higher pixels density and a lot larger display.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Note 3 features a much faster CPU than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has an additional graphics processing unit and a higher number of cores (and faster).
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a lot better camera than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has a way higher 13 megapixels resolution camera. Galaxy Note 3 has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has a 252 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy Note 3 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.