Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2006-01-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.17 x 1.95 x 0.70 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.77 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6.3 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 20,48 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| SD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 880mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 196 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is much better than Motorola ROKR E2, with an 80.7 score against 31.2. Although Google Pixel 3 XL is much heavier than the Motorola ROKR E2, it's incredibly thinner and also newer. Google Pixel 3 XL features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola ROKR E2, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features much more storage to install applications and games than Motorola ROKR E2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much greater performance than Motorola ROKR E2, because it has a greater number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a way better camera than Motorola ROKR E2, because it has a much more megapixels back-facing camera. Google Pixel 3 XL features a way better battery life than Motorola ROKR E2, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 3 XL is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.