Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2006-01-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.17 x 1.95 x 0.70 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.77 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 20,48 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| SD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 0.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 880mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 196 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is way better than Motorola ROKR E2's 31.2 overall score. LG V40 ThinQ is a extremely newer and thinner device than Motorola ROKR E2, although it is also noticeably heavier. LG V40 ThinQ features a much better processing power than Motorola ROKR E2, because it has more processing cores.
The LG V40 ThinQ has an incredibly better display than Motorola ROKR E2, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a greater camera than Motorola ROKR E2, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola ROKR E2, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola ROKR E2, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ costs a little more money than the Motorola ROKR E2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.