Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.234
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
2006-01-032008-06-27
4.17 x 1.95 x 0.70 inches3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches
3.77 ounces4.37 ounces
$ 199.00$ 185.00
Display / Screen
--2.2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.16.4
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
20,48 MB internal memory25,6 MB internal memory
SD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.30.3
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.515.17
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
880mAh Li-Ion Battery870mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
196 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.42.4
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Nokia 7510 Supernova has a general score of 34, which is just a bit better than the Motorola ROKR E2's 31.2 score. The Nokia 7510 Supernova is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Motorola ROKR E2, but it is heavier. Nokia 7510 Supernova counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the processing unit in Motorola ROKR E2, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit.

Nokia 7510 Supernova features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola ROKR E2. They have the same resolution of 320 x 240. The Nokia 7510 Supernova's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Motorola ROKR E2's one, because although the Nokia 7510 Supernova has no SD card slot, it also counts with 25,6 MB internal memory capacity.

The Nokia 7510 Supernova's battery lifetime is very similar to the Motorola ROKR E2 one, although the Nokia 7510 Supernova has just 870mAh of battery capacity against 880mAh. The Nokia 7510 Supernova takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola ROKR E2, because it has a much more mega pixels back camera.

Nokia 7510 Supernova not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.