Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.234
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Symbian 9.1
2006-01-032006-09-26
4.17 x 1.95 x 0.70 inches3.74 x 2.04 x 0.79 inches
3.77 ounces4.35 ounces
$ 199.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.16.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
20,48 MB internal memory61,44 MB internal memory
SD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.30.5
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
4.515.5
EDGE and GSMUMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.4
Battery Life
880mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
196 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
200 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
2.42.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0
--Infra-red port
FM RadioFM Radio

Comparison review

Nokia N75 has a score of 34, which is a bit better than Motorola ROKR E2's general score of 31.2. Despite being the best in this review, Nokia N75's body is somewhat thicker and heavier than the Motorola ROKR E2. The Nokia N75's processing unit is very similar to the processing unit in Motorola ROKR E2, both of them have the same number of cores.

The Nokia N75 has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola ROKR E2. Both have an equal resolution of 320 x 240. The Nokia N75 counts with a lot better camera than Motorola ROKR E2, because it has a camera with a much better resolution. Nokia N75 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola ROKR E2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 40,96 MB more internal storage.

Motorola ROKR E2 features a little better battery performance than Nokia N75, because it has a 10 percent greater battery size.

Nokia N75 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.