Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.2 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Linux | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.37 x 2.02 x 0.57 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.26 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 99.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 8,19 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| SD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.73 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 0.2 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 235 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket has a general score of 71.5, which is a lot better than Motorola ROKR E6's score of 35.2. The Galaxy S III Cricket has Android 4.0 operating system, while Motorola ROKR E6 works with Linux operating system. Galaxy S III Cricket's design is much thinner but just a bit heavier than the Motorola ROKR E6.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a much sharper display than Motorola ROKR E6, because it has a much greater number of pixels per inch in the screen, a lot larger screen and a way higher 1280 x 720 resolution. The Galaxy S III Cricket has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola ROKR E6, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much better processing power than Motorola ROKR E6, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and an additional GPU. Galaxy S III Cricket has a really longer battery performance than Motorola ROKR E6, because it has a 2100mAh battery capacity against 1000mAh.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a way better camera than Motorola ROKR E6, because it has a lot more mega pixels back camera and a way better 1920x1080 video quality.
Galaxy S III Cricket costs a bit more money than Motorola ROKR E6, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.