Search


Compare phones

Global Score
35.237.9
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
Linux--
--2010-06-23
4.37 x 2.02 x 0.57 inches4.60 x 2.11 x 0.60 inches
4.26 ounces4.34 ounces
$ 99.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches--
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
167 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
ResistiveNo touch screen
65.8
processor Single-Core 184 MHz processor
GPU GPU
5.765.67
Storage
8,19 MB internal memory71,68 MB internal memory
SD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.21.5
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution--
4.734.73
GPRS and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.9
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
235 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.562.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Samsung Gravity 3 is a bit better than Motorola ROKR E6, getting a global score of 37.9 against 35.2. The Samsung Gravity 3 design is a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the Motorola ROKR E6. The Motorola ROKR E6 features a bit better display than Samsung Gravity 3, and although they both have the same exact 320 x 240px resolution, the Motorola ROKR E6 also has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.

Motorola ROKR E6 has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Gravity 3, although it has 1 lesser and slower cpu cores. Samsung Gravity 3 and Motorola ROKR E6 have extremely similar cameras, both have a same resolution camera in the back. The Samsung Gravity 3 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola ROKR E6, because it has 71,68 MB internal memory.

The Samsung Gravity 3 and Motorola ROKR E6 both have very similar batteries performance.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Gravity 3 is also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.