Search


Compare phones

Samsung Champ

GT-C3300K, GT-C3300
Global Score
34.537.4
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
2006-07-252010-05-19
4.15 x 1.79 x 0.62 inches3.79 x 2.12 x 0.51 inches
4.05 ounces2.82 ounces
$ 120.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.66
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
20,48 MB internal memory30,72 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slot
0.31.16
Camera
2.00 MP1.30 MP
4.734.51
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
780mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
350 hours standby time
6.7 hours talk time
666 hours standby time
12 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.1, EDR

Comparison review

The Samsung Champ has an overall score of 37.4, which is a little bit better than the Motorola ROKR Z3's score of 34.5. Samsung Champ is a notably newer device, and it is also incredibly lighter and thinner than the Motorola ROKR Z3. The Samsung Champ counts with a little bit better display than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has a higher 320 x 240 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per screen inch.

The Samsung Champ counts with a CPU that is very similar to the Motorola ROKR Z3 one, both have a 0-Core processor. Motorola ROKR Z3 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Champ, because it has a back camera with a way better 2 MP resolution. The Samsung Champ counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has more internal storage.

Samsung Champ has greater battery life than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has a 1000mAh battery capacity against 780mAh.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Champ is also a bargain compared to others, making it an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.