Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.537.9
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
2006-07-252010-06-23
4.15 x 1.79 x 0.62 inches4.60 x 2.11 x 0.60 inches
4.05 ounces4.34 ounces
$ 120.00$ 80.00
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.65.8
processor Single-Core 184 MHz processor
GPU GPU
5.765.67
Storage
20,48 MB internal memory71,68 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.31.5
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.734.73
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.9
Battery Life
780mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
350 hours standby time
6.7 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

Samsung Gravity 3 is just a bit better than Motorola ROKR Z3, having a 37.9 score against 34.5. Even though the Samsung Gravity 3 is a little heavier than the Motorola ROKR Z3, it's a bit thinner and also way newer. Motorola ROKR Z3 features a bit superior processor than Samsung Gravity 3, although it has an inferior number of cores.

The Samsung Gravity 3 has a little bit better screen than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has a higher 320 x 240 resolution and a just a bit greater pixel quantity per inch of display. Samsung Gravity 3 counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has 71,68 MB internal memory capacity.

Samsung Gravity 3 counts with better battery performance than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity instead of 780mAh. Samsung Gravity 3 has a camera that is very similar to Motorola ROKR Z3's camera, they have a camera with a 2 megapixels.

In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Gravity 3 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.