Search


Compare phones

Global Score
35.137.9
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
2007-03-272010-06-23
4.15 x 1.79 x 0.63 inches4.60 x 2.11 x 0.60 inches
3.80 ounces4.34 ounces
$ 120.00$ 80.00
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
200 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.25.8
processor Single-Core 184 MHz processor
GPU GPU
5.765.67
Storage
--71,68 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01.5
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.734.73
CDMAHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.9
Battery Life
910mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
370 hours standby time
4.3 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.42.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPSGPS

Comparison review

The Samsung Gravity 3 has a general score of 37.9, which is a bit better than the Motorola ROKR Z6m's 35.1 overall score. Samsung Gravity 3's design is incredibly newer and a bit thinner than Motorola ROKR Z6m's, but it's heavier. The Motorola ROKR Z6m features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Gravity 3, although it has 1 lesser and slower processing cores.

The Motorola ROKR Z6m has a bit sharper display than Samsung Gravity 3, and although they both have the same exact resolution of 320 x 240, the Motorola ROKR Z6m also has a higher pixels density. The Samsung Gravity 3 has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola ROKR Z6m.

The Samsung Gravity 3 has a camera that is just as good as the Motorola ROKR Z6m one, both of them have a 2 MP back facing camera. Samsung Gravity 3 has a little longer battery performance than Motorola ROKR Z6m, because it has a 1000mAh battery size.

The Samsung Gravity 3 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.