Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-08-05 | 2019-12-27 |
| 4.49 x 2.44 x 0.47 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.02 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 289.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Single-Core 800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.11 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (24 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than Motorola Spice XT, having a score of 85.5 against 48.3. The Samsung Galaxy A51 design is much newer and notably thinner, but also a lot heavier than Motorola Spice XT. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Motorola Spice XT has Android 2.3.4 version.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much sharper screen than Motorola Spice XT, because it has a much greater display pixel density, a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a way larger screen. Galaxy A51 counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Spice XT, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 7 more CPU cores.
The Galaxy A51 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Spice XT, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A51 has a very superior battery duration than Motorola Spice XT, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1540mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a way better camera than Motorola Spice XT, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.