Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.3 | 35.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.2 |
| -- | 2006-11-28 |
| 3.50 x 1.90 x 1.00 inches | 3.70 x 1.96 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.90 ounces | 4.05 ounces |
| $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.2 inches |
| 120 x 160 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| STN | TFT |
| -- | 182 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.9 | 6.5 |
| processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor |
| -- | 64 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 51,2 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.73 |
| GPRS and GSM | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 230 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 264 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6290 is way better than the Motorola T720i / T722, with a 35.1 score against 28.3. The Nokia 6290 is a a little bit heavier but somewhat thinner device than the Motorola T720i / T722. The Nokia 6290 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola T720i / T722, because it has a much better resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.
The Nokia 6290 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola T720i / T722, because it has more processing cores. Nokia 6290 has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola T720i / T722. The Nokia 6290 shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola T720i / T722, because it has a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Nokia 6290 counts with better battery life than Motorola T720i / T722, because it has a 27% more battery size.
The Nokia 6290 and the Motorola T720i / T722 cost exactly the same, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.