Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 24.6 | 32.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | 2006-04-05 |
| 3.54 x 1.87 x 1.01 inches | 3.36 x 1.89 x 0.90 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 3.27 ounces |
| $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
| 120 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| -- | 165 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.56 |
Comparison review
The LG CG225 has a global score of 32.2, which is way better than the Motorola T725's 24.6 score. The LG CG225 is a lighter and thinner phone than the Motorola T725. LG CG225 has a way better looking display than Motorola T725, although it has a little lower 128 x 128px resolution. LG CG225's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as Motorola T725's one.
LG CG225's processing unit is very similar to the Motorola T725 one, both have 0 CPU cores. The LG CG225 counts with a way better camera than Motorola T725. LG CG225 counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola T725, because it has a 33 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG CG225 and the Motorola T725 cost the same, which makes it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.