Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-29 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Carbon Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than Motorola ThinkPhone, having a score of 83.8 against 78.9. Galaxy A50 is an notably older phone than the Motorola ThinkPhone, but Samsung was able to make it just a little thinner and lighter. The Motorola ThinkPhone features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola ThinkPhone, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola ThinkPhone, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Motorola ThinkPhone features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Motorola ThinkPhone has improved battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.