Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-29 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.25 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Carbon Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than the Motorola ThinkPhone's general score of 78.9. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is incredibly older than the Motorola ThinkPhone, it's design is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Motorola ThinkPhone has Android 13.
The Motorola ThinkPhone counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit smaller display, a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit less pixels per display inch. Galaxy Z Flip and Motorola ThinkPhone feature very similar storage to install applications and games, they have equal internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a way better performance than Motorola ThinkPhone, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 7 more CPU cores. The Motorola ThinkPhone counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's camera is just as good as the camera in Motorola ThinkPhone, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a lot smaller sensor which gives a way lower photo and video quality and a way less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.