Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-29 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Carbon Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than the Motorola ThinkPhone's 78.9 score. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Motorola ThinkPhone has Android 13 version. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and heavier than Motorola ThinkPhone, it's design is still somewhat thinner.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior performance than Motorola ThinkPhone, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory. Motorola ThinkPhone has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola ThinkPhone and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 feature quite similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have the same internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better camera than Motorola ThinkPhone, although it has a smaller sensor and a camera with lot less mega-pixels, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
The Motorola ThinkPhone counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.