Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.4 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 2.1 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2011-05-05 | 2019-06-14 |
| 4.71 x 2.44 x 0.53 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.20 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | White |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 70.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 186 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1820mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 235 hours standby time 6.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Compass | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 C is way better than Motorola TITANIUM, having a 64.8 score against 40.4. Nokia 3.1 C's body is notably newer and noticeably thinner, but a bit heavier than Motorola TITANIUM. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia 3.1 C has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola TITANIUM has Android 2.1.
Nokia 3.1 C counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola TITANIUM, because it has a greater number of cores. The Nokia 3.1 C counts with a better display than Motorola TITANIUM, because it has a really bigger display, a way higher screen density and a way better resolution of 720 x 1440.
The Nokia 3.1 C shoots way better photographs and videos than Motorola TITANIUM, because it has a back camera with much more mega-pixels. Nokia 3.1 C features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola TITANIUM, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 128 GB.
The Nokia 3.1 C counts with a superior battery life than Motorola TITANIUM, because it has a 2990mAh battery capacity instead of 1820mAh.
The Nokia 3.1 C and the Motorola TITANIUM cost exactly the same, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.