Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 2.2 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2011-06-09 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.80 x 2.60 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 228 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 2 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.22 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola TRIUMPH's score of 51.7. Google Pixel 3a XL is a notably newer and thinner phone than the Motorola TRIUMPH, but it's heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a XL has newer 11 version and Motorola TRIUMPH has Android 2.2 version.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much better processing power than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores. Google Pixel 3a XL features a sharper display than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has a much greater display pixels density, a way higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a way larger display.
Google Pixel 3a XL takes greater photographs and videos than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much better resolution camera. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola TRIUMPH, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 1400mAh.
The Google Pixel 3a XL not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola TRIUMPH, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.