Compare phones
Motorola TRIUMPH
WX435Motorola Moto E
for America| Global Score | |
| 51.7 | 56.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 2.2 | Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 |
| 2011-06-09 | 2014-05-13 |
| 4.80 x 2.60 x 0.39 inches | 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.01 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.1 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 228 pixels per inch | 256 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.38 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 2 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.22 | 3.82 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.71 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.6 | 4.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto E is slightly better than the Motorola TRIUMPH, getting a 56.9 score against 51.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Motorola Moto E has newer 4.4.4 version and Motorola TRIUMPH has Android 2.2. Motorola Moto E's construction is notably newer and just a little lighter than the Motorola TRIUMPH's, although it's also thicker.
Moto E features a bit better processing unit than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has a greater number of cores, an additional graphics processor and 512 MB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto E has a little bit better screen than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has a little bit better screen pixel density, a little bigger screen and a quite better 960 x 540 pixels resolution.
The Moto E has a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola TRIUMPH, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 32 GB, the Moto E also has more internal memory capacity. Moto E features a way better battery life than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has a 1980mAh battery size against 1400mAh.
The Motorola TRIUMPH captures much better pictures and videos than Moto E. Both of them have a back facing camera with a 5 mega-pixels.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola Moto E is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.