Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.2 | -- |
| 2011-06-09 | 2017-04-21 |
| 4.80 x 2.60 x 0.39 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 228 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 2 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.22 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is way better than the Motorola TRIUMPH, getting an 81.7 score against 51.7. Galaxy S8's construction is a lot newer and a lot thinner than the Motorola TRIUMPH's, although it is also a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy S8 features a way better looking display than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels, a lot larger display and a way better count of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy S8 has an extremely better CPU than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has more cpu cores and 3,5 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S8 has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S8 features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has a 114 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a lot better camera than Motorola TRIUMPH, because it has a back camera with a way higher 12 mega pixels resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S8 costs a bit more money than the Motorola TRIUMPH, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.