Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2008-09-23 | 2019-05-07 |
| 3.86 x 2.14 x 0.94 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 102,4 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1130mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 337 hours standby time 5.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is way better than the Motorola Tundra, with a 78.9 score against 35.4. Google Pixel 3a XL is a noticeably newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than the Motorola Tundra, although it's somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 3a XL has a much better display than Motorola Tundra, because it has a way better 1080 x 2160px resolution, a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a lot larger screen.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Tundra, because it has a greater number of cores. The Google Pixel 3a XL takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Tundra, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 12.2 megapixels resolution. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola Tundra, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Tundra, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3a XL is also a bit cheaper, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.