Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.7 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| 3.70 x 2.80 x 1.10 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 5.60 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 350.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 96 x 68 pixels |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 72 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1600 is a little bit better than the Motorola V100, having a 26 score against 23.7. The Nokia 1600 design is noticeably lighter and way thinner than Motorola V100. The Nokia 1600 has a much better screen than Motorola V100. The Nokia 1600 and Motorola V100 have really similar processors, both of them have a 0-Core processor.
The Nokia 1600 and Motorola V100 both count with incredibly similar cameras. Nokia 1600 has as much memory to install games and applications as the Motorola V100 one. Nokia 1600 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola V100.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Nokia 1600 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.