Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.7 | 25.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2007-05-03 |
| 3.70 x 2.80 x 1.10 inches | 3.42 x 1.77 x 0.82 inches |
| 5.60 ounces | 2.83 ounces |
| $ 350.00 | $ 150.00 |
| -- | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| -- | 73 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 4.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 72 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 310 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.08 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 2660 has a general score of 25.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola V100's 23.7 score. Nokia 2660's construction is way thinner and much lighter than the Motorola V100. The Motorola V100 and the Nokia 2660 count with similar CPUs, both have the same number of cores. Nokia 2660 has a lot better screen than Motorola V100.
The Motorola V100 and the Nokia 2660 count with really similar cameras. Nokia 2660 counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola V100. The Nokia 2660 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola V100.
The Nokia 2660 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.