Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.762.1
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Android 10
--2020-10-19
--5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches
3.20 ounces6.35 ounces
--Blue
--Plastic and Plastic
$ 89.00$ 89.00
Display / Screen
--5.5 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)1440 x 720 pixels
TFTIPS LCD
--293 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.17.3
Performance
--MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset
processorARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor
--2 GB RAM
GPUPowerVR GE8300 GPU
5.768.73
Storage
--16 GB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
06.72
Camera
1.20 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
4.47.48
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
UMTS, GPRS and GSMLTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA
SIMNano SIM
0.26.7
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery3000mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
120 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
--
1.364.96
Other Features
--Bluetooth 4.2
GPSGPS
Infra-red port--
--Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Nokia 2 V Tella is much better than the Motorola V1000, getting a general score of 62.1 against 30.7. The Nokia 2 V Tella features a lot better looking screen than Motorola V1000, because it has a lot higher 720 x 1440px resolution. Nokia 2 V Tella has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola V1000.

Nokia 2 V Tella features a much faster processing unit than Motorola V1000, because it has more CPU cores. Nokia 2 V Tella counts with a much better battery life than Motorola V1000. Nokia 2 V Tella takes greater photos and videos than Motorola V1000, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.

The Nokia 2 V Tella and the Motorola V1000 cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.