Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.760.4
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
--Android 4.2
--2014-03-15
--5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches
3.20 ounces4.90 ounces
--Black and White
$ 89.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--4.5 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)540 x 960 pixels
TFTTFT
--245 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
3.17.8
processor Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor
--1 GB RAM
GPUYes GPU
5.768.1
Storage
--8 GB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
04.62
Camera
1.20 MP5.00 MP + 0.30 MP
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
4.45.94
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
UMTS, GPRS and GSMHSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMMicro SIM
0.24.6
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery2100mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
120 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
--
1.364
Other Features
--Bluetooth 4.0, EDR
GPSGPS
Infra-red port--
--Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Galaxy S3 Slim has an overall score of 60.4, which is much better than the Motorola V1000's 30.7 score. Galaxy S3 Slim has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola V1000, because it has a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has a way better looking display than Motorola V1000, because it has a lot better resolution of 960 x 540.

The Galaxy S3 Slim takes much better photos and videos than Motorola V1000, because it has a lot more MP back camera. The Galaxy S3 Slim features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola V1000. Galaxy S3 Slim features a way better battery duration than Motorola V1000.

The Galaxy S3 Slim costs a bit more than the Motorola V1000, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.