Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.4 | 39 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.4 |
| -- | 2010-08-24 |
| 3.70 x 4.05 x 2.75 inches | 4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 3.77 ounces |
| -- | Blue, Gray, Purple, Red and White |
| $ 59.00 | $ 59.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.8 inches |
| -- | 360 x 640 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| -- | 262 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 2.7 | 7.2 |
| processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.48 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 52,22 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| -- | 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 0 | 5.28 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 2.3 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 7.7 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 5250 has a score of 39, which is way better than the Motorola V200's general score of 24.4. The Nokia 5250 is a notably lighter and a lot thinner cellphone than the Motorola V200. Nokia 5250 counts with a superior performance than Motorola V200, because it has a higher number of cores. Nokia 5250 has a much sharper display than Motorola V200.
The Nokia 5250 counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola V200, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 16 GB. The Nokia 5250 counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola V200, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity. The Nokia 5250 captures greater photographs and videos than Motorola V200.
Nokia 5250 and the Motorola V200 cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.