Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.5 | 31.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-04-02 |
| 3.50 x 1.93 x 0.98 inches | 3.89 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 3.33 ounces |
| $ 1055.00 | $ 79.00 |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 5,12 MB internal memory | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 128 x 96 video resolution |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 419 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time |
| 2 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2680 slide has an overall score of 31.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola V300's 28.5 overall score. Nokia 2680 slide's body is extremely thinner and lighter than the Motorola V300. Nokia 2680 slide counts with a CPU that is very similar to the processor in Motorola V300, they have the same number of cores.
Nokia 2680 slide counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola V300, although it has a much lower 160 x 128 resolution. The Nokia 2680 slide's camera is very similar to the Motorola V300 one, both have a back-facing camera with a 0.3 MP resolution. The Nokia 2680 slide counts with much more storage for applications and games than Motorola V300, because it has 32,77 MB internal storage.
The Nokia 2680 slide features longer battery life than Motorola V300, because it has a 32 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia 2680 slide is also a bargain compared to others, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.