Compare phones
Nokia 1661
1661, 1662| Global Score | |
| 28.6 | 27.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-11-04 |
| 3.89 x 1.77 x 0.90 inches | 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches |
| 3.80 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 39.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 5,12 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.32 |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola V80 has an overall score of 28.6, which is a bit better than the Nokia 1661's 27.3 general score. Despite being the best device in this review, the Motorola V80 is a notably thicker and heavier device than the Nokia 1661. Nokia 1661 features a much sharper screen than Motorola V80, although it has a lot worse resolution of 160 x 128 pixels.
Nokia 1661's processor is very similar to the Motorola V80 one, they have the same number of cores. The Motorola V80 counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 1661. The Motorola V80 captures greater pictures and videos than Nokia 1661. Nokia 1661 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola V80, because it has 860mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola V80 is also the cheapest one, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.