Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3439
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Symbian 9.4
0000-00-002010-08-24
3.90 x 1.89 x 0.70 inches4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches
3.77 ounces3.77 ounces
--Blue, Gray, Purple, Red and White
$ 59.00$ 59.00
Display / Screen
1.9 inches2.8 inches
176 x 220 pixels 360 x 640 pixels
TFTTFT
148 pixels per inch262 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.77.2
processorARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.48
Storage
--52,22 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01.4
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.515.28
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
940mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
288 hours standby time
4.5 hours talk time
450 hours standby time
7.7 hours talk time
2.482.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Nokia 5250 has a general score of 39, which is much better than the Motorola VE465's 34 general score. Nokia 5250's design weights the same than Motorola VE465, but it's incredibly thinner. The Nokia 5250 features a better performing CPU than Motorola VE465, because it has 1 more cores. Nokia 5250 has a lot better display than Motorola VE465, because it has a much larger display, a lot higher 640 x 360 resolution and a much better display pixels density.

Nokia 5250 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola VE465. Nokia 5250 has just a little better battery life than Motorola VE465, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity. The Nokia 5250 shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola VE465, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher 2 mega-pixels resolution.

Nokia 5250 and the Motorola VE465 cost exactly the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.