Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.136.4
Basic Information
MotorolaLG
2008-10-062009-03-30
3.65 x 2.09 x 0.76 inches4.16 x 2.11 x 0.62 inches
3.40 ounces3.81 ounces
$ 200.00$ 125.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2.8 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
157 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.86
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
15,36 MB internal memory81,92 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.30.5
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
3.634.84
CDMAHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.9
Battery Life
950mAh Li-Ion Battery950mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
447 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
264 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.482.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.0
GPSGPS
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The LG Xenon is a bit better than the Motorola VU204, having a score of 36.4 against 33.1. Although the LG Xenon and Motorola VU204 were released with only 6 months difference, LG Xenon's body is heavier but also somewhat thinner than Motorola VU204. LG Xenon counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the CPU in Motorola VU204, they have the same number of cores.

LG Xenon has just a bit better screen than Motorola VU204, because it has a just a bit higher pixels density, a really larger display and a lot better 400 x 240 resolution. LG Xenon has a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola VU204, because it has 81,92 MB internal storage.

LG Xenon has a much better camera than Motorola VU204, because it has a back facing camera with lot more MP. LG Xenon has a battery performance that's very similar to the battery duration in Motorola VU204.

Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG Xenon is also a bargain compared to others.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.