Compare phones
Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180Nokia 1661
1661, 1662| Global Score | |
| 28.6 | 27.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| 2007-10-11 | 2008-11-04 |
| 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches | 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches |
| 2.99 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 940mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.32 |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola W175 has a global score of 28.6, which is slightly better than the Nokia 1661's general score of 27.3. Although it's the best device in this review, Motorola W175's construction is older, just a little thicker and just a bit heavier than the Nokia 1661. The Nokia 1661 has a little bit better screen than Motorola W175, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the display and a quite better 160 x 128 resolution.
Nokia 1661's CPU is very similar to Motorola W175's processing unit, they have the same number of cores. Nokia 1661 and Motorola W175 have similar storage capacity to install applications and games. Nokia 1661's camera is just as good as the Motorola W175 one. Motorola W175 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Nokia 1661, because it has a 9% larger battery capacity.
The Motorola W175 and the Nokia 1661 cost the same, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.