Search


Compare phones

Motorola W175

W175, W175g, W180
Global Score
28.648.9
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Symbian Belle
2007-10-112011-08-24
4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches4.37 x 2.09 x 0.56 inches
2.99 ounces3.53 ounces
--Black, Green, Pink and White
$ 40.00$ 40.00
Display / Screen
--3.2 inches
128 x 128 pixels 360 x 640 pixels
STNTFT
101 pixels per inch229 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.27.5
processorARM11 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor
--512 MB RAM
GPUYes GPU
5.767.38
Storage
--2 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
03.22
Camera
--5.00 MP
--1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution
06.27
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.13.3
Battery Life
940mAh Li-Ion Battery1200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
465 hours standby time
9.8 hours talk time
540 hours standby time
15 hours talk time
2.482.88
Other Features
--Bluetooth 3.0
--GPS
--NFC
--Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Nokia 600 is much better than Motorola W175, having a 48.9 score against 28.6. Nokia 600's body is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than Motorola W175. Nokia 600 features a much better screen than Motorola W175, because it has a way better pixels number per display inch and a much better resolution of 640 x 360px.

The Nokia 600 features a superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola W175, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 32 GB. The Nokia 600 counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola W175, because it has more CPU cores. Nokia 600 features better battery life than Motorola W175, because it has a 28 percent greater battery capacity.

The Nokia 600 shoots way better photographs and videos than Motorola W175.

Nokia 600 costs the same than the Motorola W175, making it a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.